Difference Between HGH and SteroidsAthletes are generally well educated regarding substances that they may use as ergogenic aids. This includes tren prohormone pct steroids and growth hormone. Fortunately, the abuse of growth hormone is limited by its cost and the fact that anabolic steroids are simply more enticing to the athlete. There are, however, significant potential adverse effects regarding its use that can be best understood by studying known growth hormone excess, as demonstrated in the acromegalic syndrome. Gorwth athletes are anabolic steroids vs. human growth hormone with this syndrome and education of the potential consequences of growth hormone excess is important in counseling athletes considering its use. While athletes contemplating the use of anabolic steroids may correctly perceive their risks for significant physiologic effects to be small if they use the steroids for brief periods of time, many of these same athletes are unaware of the potential for habituation to anabolic steroids vs. human growth hormone use of anabolic steroids.
Difference Between Anabolic Steroids and Human Growth Hormone
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. Anabolic steroids, bodybuilding discussion forums. Results 1 to 18 of Any one try both, and get better results with one then the other? AND does growth hormone make your penis larger? Like many other anti-aging physicians, I was extremely impressed by the initial research on growth hormone showing dramatic improvements in body composition, kidney function, skin, mood, well being, etc.
I have been a member of the Growth Hormone Research Society for many years and have closely followed all the latest research on growth hormone and other adult hormone replacement therapies. As the number of studies on growth hormone as well as testosterone has piled up since I first began prescribing testosterone, I believe now is the time to look back at the research and see if growth hormone and testosterone have lived up to their promises.
It is well established in bodybuilding circles that testosterone is superior to growth hormone for gaining muscle. However, growth hormone still is enormously popular and generally has a better reputation than testosterone both in bodybuilding and in anti-aging circles. The general impression is that testosterone will make you big, but at the price of acne, puffiness, temper tantrums, prostate enlargement, and possibly "gyno". Well it is acknowledged that growth hormone is not as anabolic as testosterone, people still think of growth hormone as a hormone that will make you lean and toned with almost no side effects.
Growth hormone also has a reputation as being the "fountain of youth" among anti-aging enthusiasts, whereas testosterone is still considered somewhat dangerous.
New research has shed some light on the anabolic effects of growth hormone. Several studies in the past have shown an increase in lean body mass in subjects taking growth hormone. However, lean body mass does not necessarily mean muscle, but anything that is not fat and this includes water, organ tissue growth, bone mass, and connective tissue growth. My friend Michael Mooney author of Built to Survive and editor of the Medibolics Newsletter has helped publicize the fact that not much, if any, of the lean mass gained while on growth hormone is actually muscle.
One recent study on HIV positive test subjects showed no significant change in skeletal muscle mass after taking six milligrams about 18 units per day of growth hormone for 12 weeks.
Growth hormone is probably equally ineffective in healthy individuals. One study on young aged , highly trained athletes did show a significant increase in lean mass after six weeks of taking 2. It seems overwhelming clear that growth hormone is either non-anabolic or very weakly anabolic for skeletal muscle when taken by itself, and it definitely not worth the large price if you are taking it solely for gaining muscle.
The only real use in gaining muscle may be as a synergistic agent with testosterone. A synergistic effect of taking growth hormone with testosterone has been reported for increases in lean mass, but further research needs to be done to see if this synergistic effects holds for skeletal muscle. Keep in mind that some increases in lean mass are not desirable. Growing some organs too big such as kidneys can produce some embarrassing effects seen in some professional bodybuilders.
You do not want your "guts" sticking blatantly out of your body. But enough on growth hormone for muscle gain. If you are going to spend the money on growth hormone to try to improve your body, your best bet is to use it as a fat loss or "sculpting" agent. So well it is well established that testosterone is far, far better for building muscle than growth hormone, is growth hormone the better choice for fat loss?
The research on this issue is mixed, and there is no easy answer to this question. One recent study put growth hormone head to head with testosterone and measured its effects on fat loss. For one thing, this study was on very old individuals aged 65 to 88 who had low IGF-1 and testosterone levels.
This is more than the averages of the testosterone alone and growth hormone alone groups combined. Not all studies have shown this dramatic of an effect on body fat. One study using fairly large doses adjusted by weight, but roughly 5 mg per day on obese women failed to show any significant effects on body fat. The main significant result was that the growth hormone group lost much less lean mass an average loss of 1.
While there are a good number of studies showing growth hormone to be effective for fat loss, testosterone may be almost as good for this purpose. Testosterone was recently found to be effective for fat loss in young men even in small doses. One recent study showed that men given only milligrams per week of testosterone enanthate lost an average of six percent of their bodyfat after eight weeks. Most impressive about this study was that the result was obtained in young, normal healthy men aged 18 to 45 , not obese or testosterone deficient.
While the amount of muscle gain reported in this study was not reported it is still just in abstract form , another study showed mg per week of testosterone enanthate was not anabolic.
Considering how much cheaper testosterone is than growth hormone, it may well be the cost-effective choice for burning fat even if it is slightly less effective overall. However, recent research is rapidly showing that much of these dangers have been exaggerated. For instance, the hypothesis that testosterone causes prostate cancer has never been established. In fact, one study even showed a slight negative correlation between testosterone levels and prostate cancer! A study on young men given supraphysiologic doses of testosterone showed no change is prostate specific antigen PSA , which is one measure of prostate cancer risk.
One study showed strong positive correlation with prostate cancer and IGF-1 levels. Keep in mind that statistical correlations do not necessarily prove causality, i.
IGF-1 has not yet been proven to be a cancer-causing villain. At the Serano sponsored Symposia on the Endocrinology of Aging in October, and at the Endocrine Society Meeting in June, there was an informal consensus that patients on growth hormone did not increase their risk of breast or prostate cancer.
Several other recent studies have also cast doubt on the role of growth hormone as a cancer-causing villain. Testosterone may have also gotten a bad rap for its effects on blood lipids. Since testosterone and other anabolic steroids have been shown in some studies to lower HDL cholesterol levels, it was believed that testosterone may increase the risk for heart disease. This was refuted in one recent study on testosterone that showed some positive results.
A study on 21 hypogonadal men aged 36 to 57 showed a replacement dose of testosterone using the Androderm transdermal patch to reduce blood clotting. Another study showed a very strong negative correlation with testosterone levels and heart disease. Growth hormone has shown mixed results on its effects on heart disease risk.
One study on elderly men and women aged showed that growth hormone administration to lower LDL levels, but raised triglyceride levels. While much more research needs to be done, I am convinced right now that testosterone replacement therapy in hypogonadal men may be safer than excessively large doses of growth hormone. The long-term studies have not yet been done to test the true long-term effects of these hormones, but the research seems quite clear at the moment.
Michael Mooney has reported similar results on safety and side effects of these hormones: While none of the studies on testosterone or anabolic steroids used for HIV have documented any significant health problems associated with their proper therapeutic use, Dr. Gabe Torres' data on his patients who experienced a reduction in symptoms of HIV-related lipodystrophy with Serostim growth hormone showed that at the standard 5 and 6 mg doses, 80 percent of his HIV patients experienced significant side effects, that included elevated glucose, elevated pancreatic enzymes, or carpal tunnel syndrome.
This article is not meant to say one hormone is "good" and another is "bad". Since growth hormone is extremely expensive and perhaps riskier than testosterone, I screen patients very carefully and only recommend it to those who either have very low IGF-1 levels and fail growth hormone stimulation tests, or those who have failed to respond to testosterone or other therapies.
The new research has also made me confident in encouraging more and more patients to go on testosterone. However, we must keep constant track of the new research to better refine both anti-aging and bodybuilding programs.
The science of hormone supplementation is still in its infancy, and there is still a lot more questions that need to be answered.
Am J Physiol Effect of growth hormone and resistance exercise on muscle growth in young men. Am J Physiol, 3 Pt 1: E Mar 3. Crist DM, et al. Body composition response to exogenous GH during training in highly conditioned adults. Blackman, MR, et al. Tagliaferri M, et al. Metabolic effects of biosynthetic growth hormone treatment in severely energy-restricted obese women. Anawalt, BD, et al. Testosterone administration to normal men decreases truncal and total body fat.
Friedl KE, et al. Comparison of the effects of high dose testosterone and nortestosterone to a replacement dose of testosterone on strength and body composition in normal men. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. The effect of exogenous testosterone on total and free prostate specific antigen levels in healthy young men.
Never Too Old Disclaimer: The information we share is for entertainment purposes only. Yeah, does HGH make your penis bigger? Good Grief, the questions here are getting more entertaining by the day! Very interesting article StoneCold.
Thought I'd jump in and give my two cents from experience. The test definitely adds muscles more quickly with a good diet. I think the GH helps to keep those gains. I've definitely lost some fat, though I can't give specifics, since I didn't measure beforehand. He who overcomes others has force; He who overcomes himself is strong.
Last edited by Nzom; at The one question i ask is growth hormone worth the money, or would you better off to spend 1k on juice? There is cheap GH from China fake , if its abnormally cheap beware - its probably bunk. I've never tried it, but with the gains you can make on juice I think GH is for those people at the upper levels or who can afford it.
How about the Jinotropin?? It is from China and have heard grave reveiws about it. GH alone doesn't build muscle mass.